its funny that we was buildin on the banks and such and on my way to the librariodicals i ran into one of his supporters passin out literature in a grimy arse train station where a bunch of winos&homeless derelicts congregate...had one of those BOB Hitler joints...trust,in the Sco,aka liberal central,that takes nuts,in fact when i spotted dude some homeless cat was fukkin with him hardbody,dude was typical socialist material out here,young,white,and naive in ways of the bricks,i had to rescue him,the prophet(pbuh)says show rahem...
he was a bright dude,a creative thinker,when he realized i wasn't gonna go bad on him&was a similar thinker he ended up giving me the literature free without a donation...
anyways,LaRouche obv isn't gonna do shyt politically the way the electoral system is set up,but i respect him for his ideas,his fearlessness,and his knowledge of conspiracies,but he has limitations...
anyways,fill in some of the blanks for the god...
__________________ "..its like when you really realize the presence of G-d,like,when you really come to realize that in your mind..like,as we stand here right now,G-d is with us..man,f u ck these cops.." one
i got hard copies,but i figure it's more useful to give ya'll an overview afore you tear into him right away...
__________________ "..its like when you really realize the presence of G-d,like,when you really come to realize that in your mind..like,as we stand here right now,G-d is with us..man,f u ck these cops.." one
dood seems nuts as fuk.. he probably has a brilliant mind and was very intelligent but paranoia probably lead him in to some of his strange ways.
you can learn something from anybody, but this cat aint that cool from what I can find on the guy. Seems rather self righteous and that his denial of his ego ruined his chances politically.
my bad sir,ya'll are much more wise with the finance aspect of politics then i,so i figured he was known,but i shouldn't assume... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_LaRouche
i got hard copies,but i figure it's more useful to give ya'll an overview afore you tear into him right away...
i knew/know of him but not in much detail or anything. I think we all “drop knowledge’ like you said assuming people know what we’re talking about on the same levels.
NOW we can always google shyt, but in light of the thread about how to make KTL better maybe we should actually DROP knowledge (links, opinions on links, general opinions) more often and all of us do more building via giving of knowledge instead of simple discussion on it.
Like many people said, they used to come here to learn, now it’s that people come here to show what they know....
Nah mean?
Back to the lecture at hand...
From what I do know of him he sounds like a pompous ass who is the type of dude to “always be right” even if it means making shyt up. Overall I think he’s to unstable of person in general to really get behind.
__________________
Come have your opinion heard...
I see his people at DMV's and Post Offices every month. I'd rather see them then the "Abortion is a sin" protesters I see every week.
exactly,at least with a free thinker they're always on the "what can be",instead of judging for "what is"...
and word More,even dude i was buildin with was kinda self righteous,but i figure in the very least by a cat like me approaching me&dialoguing with him will reveal that free thinkers can come in diff forms,not just the usual socialist "archetype"...
__________________ "..its like when you really realize the presence of G-d,like,when you really come to realize that in your mind..like,as we stand here right now,G-d is with us..man,f u ck these cops.." one
The 6 Most Insane People to Ever Run for President
#5.Lyndon LaRouche - 1976 U.S. Labor Party
Lyndon LaRouche has run for president at least eight times, first in 1976 as the U.S. Labor Party candidate, and later as a candidate for the Democratic nomination. Depending on who you ask, he is either a genius visionary or a bat**** insane conspiracy theorist. Hmm, let's see if we can find some evidence one way or the other...
Where do we start? He thinks either the Holocaust didn't happen or, if it did, wasn't all that bad and that some kind of evil Jewish/British cabal is at the heart of the world's problems. His political party looks an awful lot like a cult, with LaRouche holding tight-fisted control over a core group of dedicated followers.
Those are all good places to begin, but why settle for the good when we can go straight for the great? And by "great" we mean "the time he claimed someone kidnapped and brainwashed one of his staff members with the intent of programming them to assassinate him." According to LaRouche's group, the intended assassin was Chris White, a British national who had married LaRouche's ex-girlfriend. The young man was allegedly kidnapped by the CIA, in conjunction with the KGB. Sounds reasonable enough, what better friends were there in 1974 than the CIA and the KGB?
LaRouche's people said that, once in captivity, White was programmed so that when a trigger word was uttered, White would kill his wife, then LaRouche, and then blame the whole thing on Cuban assassins (got to work the Cubans in there). After all, if some dude just went crazy and killed his wife and her ex-boyfriend, how would you ever explain that?
exactly,at least with a free thinker they're always on the "what can be",instead of judging for "what is"...
and word More,even dude i was buildin with was kinda self righteous,but i figure in the very least by a cat like me approaching me&dialoguing with him will reveal that free thinkers can come in diff forms,not just the usual socialist "archetype"...
its funny that we was buildin on the banks and such and on my way to the librariodicals i ran into one of his supporters passin out literature in a grimy arse train station where a bunch of winos&homeless derelicts congregate...had one of those BOB Hitler joints...trust,in the Sco,aka liberal central,that takes nuts,in fact when i spotted dude some homeless cat was fukkin with him hardbody,dude was typical socialist material out here,young,white,and naive in ways of the bricks,i had to rescue him,the prophet(pbuh)says show rahem...
he was a bright dude,a creative thinker,when he realized i wasn't gonna go bad on him&was a similar thinker he ended up giving me the literature free without a donation...
anyways,LaRouche obv isn't gonna do shyt politically the way the electoral system is set up,but i respect him for his ideas,his fearlessness,and his knowledge of conspiracies,but he has limitations...
anyways,fill in some of the blanks for the god...
strange man. has his own political cult, and all them nyggas are crazy
dude i was buildin with was a bit strange,but at least he had optimistic ideas&open mind...everyone needs a mentor
__________________ "..its like when you really realize the presence of G-d,like,when you really come to realize that in your mind..like,as we stand here right now,G-d is with us..man,f u ck these cops.." one
strange man. has his own political cult, and all them nyggas are crazy
Yup thats my tenuous conclusion on his political organization, but I wouldnt use the word all when talking about them or most anygroup because you will be almost always wrong when you use the word all. It's possible I'm wrong on my assessment too. The thing with the La Rouche paper is, that it has something for everyone so I or anyone might agree with some or a lot of the paper says. That doesnt mean that that organization does not have issues with a personality cult though. Of course we could definitely say the same thing about the democratic and republican parties.
If anyone wants to do a test to see if the LaRouche supporters are operating with their own faculties ask them what they disagree with LaRouche on.
__________________
You can wipe out your opponents. But if you do it unjustly you become eligible for being wiped out yourself.
- Ernest Hemingway
SOHH party - under construction- http://forums.projectcovo.com/showthread.php?t=2452711
Yup thats my tenuous conclusion on his political organization, but I wouldnt use the word all when talking about them or most anygroup because you will be almost always wrong when you use the word all. It's possible I'm wrong on my assessment too. The thing with the La Rouche paper is, that it has something for everyone so I or anyone might agree with some or a lot of the paper says. That doesnt mean that that organization does not have issues with a personality cult though. Of course we could definitely say the same thing about the democratic and republican parties.
If anyone wants to do a test to see if the LaRouche supporters are operating with their own faculties ask them what they disagree with LaRouche on.
and word,i could see what his limitations were just by reading a few of his pamphlets,you can always tell what the limitations on any issue by what a document/speech/teaching omit in general...as far as his pusher we didn't get that far,i just presented my initial disagreements and we went from there...
__________________ "..its like when you really realize the presence of G-d,like,when you really come to realize that in your mind..like,as we stand here right now,G-d is with us..man,f u ck these cops.." one
What do ya'll think about Lyndon LaRouche?
one
