Max Kellerman | "Pedophilia"

[Gay Midget]

First of all, I'm reporting Max Kellerman. He is white, and he keeps using the word *****. Not only is this offensive, it's incredibly ignorant and annoying. :thumbsdow


Second of all, what's this bull about pedophilia in JBO?! I've made a post about this before, but being the sane, rational peoples that the mods are, you ignored it and went on your merry nazi way.

There has NEVER, nor will there EVER be pedophilia in the "PPM."

Pedophilia by definition is:

Pedophilia or paedophilia is the primary or exclusive sexual attraction by adults to prepubescent youths. A person with this attraction is called a pedophile or paedophile.

There has never been a single picture of a prepubescent youth.


The definition of Child Pornography, the alleged reason for the banning of many is:

Child pornography or child porn refers to pornographic material depicting children. It is widely accepted as a form of child sexual abuse[1] and as such these images and videos are illegal in most countries. Legal jurisdictions outlaw production, distribution, possession, and accessing child pornography. Prohibition generally covers visual representations of sexual activity by children under a given age but may also include all images of nude children, unless an artistic or medical justification can be provided.

The PPM has NEVER, and will never feature nude pictures of children. All pictures are fully clothed, and are taken by the girls themselves on their myspaces, or photobuckets. The vast majority of these girls are 17, and not one of the pictures in the entirety of this "movement" is nude.

To claim that one had "it coming" is ridiculous. There is no justification for the random bannings other then that of some personal vendetta between the mods and users.



SOHH's logic is trash.

[Gay Midget]

Our logic is trash, but yet you are the ones who named yourselves the "Pedo" Movement which would suggest your support of pedophilia right? Such as the "one-star" movement suggested support of one-staring almost every single thread possible. So it's only safe to assume that since you support "Pedo", that the links posted would be "Pedo"graphic in nature, right? It seems to me as if our logic is just fine.

That's entirely irrelevant. How something is unfortunately not aptly named applies to it's content is beyond me.

You'd think, as part of a moderator's job, that you would actually have to do further investigation then looking at the title.

While you may assume as you please, you'd think that assumption and true presumption would mean nothing as it pertains to actual action.

Once again, I shall repeat, SOHH's logic = trash.

[MelYeah]

If you call something "pedo," it's hard for us to not take it seriously.

Save your pictures of underaged girls for somewhere else.